On Thu, Jan 6, 2022 at 8:40 PM Santiago R.R. <santiag...@riseup.net> wrote: > On January 6, 2022 4:49:49 AM GMT-05:00, "Martin-Éric Racine" > <martin-eric.rac...@iki.fi> wrote: > >Hello again, > > > >ke 24. marrask. 2021 klo 16.20 Santiago Ruano Rincón > >(santiag...@riseup.net) kirjoitti: > >> El 07/11/21 a las 13:54, Martin-Éric Racine escribió: > >> > ma 27. syysk. 2021 klo 21.44 Santiago Ruano Rincón > >> > (santiag...@riseup.net) kirjoitti: > >> > > El 27/09/21 a las 20:25, Martin-Éric Racine escribió: > >> > > > Package: wnpp > >> > > > Severity: normal > >> > > > X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org > >> > > > Control: affects -1 src:isc-dhcp > >> > > > > >> > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > >> > > > Hash: SHA256 > >> > > > > >> > > > The ISC DHCP suite has a lenghty list of bug reports that have been > >> > > > left unattended. Some bugs date back to DHCP 3 or even earlier. > >> > > > > >> > > > Additionally, recent upstream releases are still unpackaged. One > >> > > > release came out well ahead of the Bullseye freeze, a bug report > >> > > > requesting its packaging was filed, but it remains unanswered. > >> > > > > >> > > > Leaving a package with a priority Important in such utter state of > >> > > > neglect is unacceptable. > >> > > > > >> > > > At this point, it has become clear that, at the very least, its > >> > > > maintainers need help, hence why I filed this WNPP bug. > >> > > > >> > > Indeed. I am willing to spend some cycles to help maintaining it. I > >> > > requested access to the ISC DHCP packaging team in salsa ~a couple of > >> > > weeks ago, but I hasn't been answered yet (mgilbert is its only > >> > > member). > >> > > It was on my ToDo list to ping the maintainers (in CC). > >> > > >> > Has any progress taken place on this? > >> > >> I've started doing some work at https://salsa.debian.org/santiago/isc-dhcp/ > >> > >> I still didn't get any answer from current maintainers (keeping them in > >> CC), so I plan to retitle this bug as an ITS bug soon. Hopefully no > >> later than next Friday. > > > >Has the ITA taken place? > > > > Not an ITA, but an ITS (CCed). I was unable close according to the ITS > schedule, and I will have to resume the work after then end of my VAC > (mid-January)
This was nearly 2 months ago. At this point, I think that apollock and mgilbert might as well be considered MIA. Martin-Éric
