In case it helps, i have pushed some commits here https://salsa.debian.org/rpil2/logcheck
eg people might want to reuse the autopkgtest or changes to postinst/postrm which make it "piuparts clean". Or not. this is not a request to maintain logcheck or to merge anything into debian - merely an exercise in understanding the existing code (which needs further simplifications in my view). if debian goes in another direction i will probably rebase and amend commits to follow On Wed, 8 Dec 2021, 19:50 Richard Lewis, < richard.lewis.deb...@googlemail.com> wrote: > great idea - is there anyone who will merge (good, sensible) > contributions? > > it seems there are many people interested in this RFA over the years but > no-one who has the ability (ie a DD) to do the final merge/upload. > > > regatdless, let's not have a competition but get many people involved (im > sure your intent too, but thought i'd say it explicitly). > > (it also occurs to me to ask whether whoever takes over might want to add > logcheck to the pkg-security team - who i cant speak for but who are highly > welcoming of new people in my recent experience. ) > > > On Wed, 8 Dec 2021, 14:57 Charles, <c...@charlesmatkinson.org> wrote: > >> This RFA is progressing slowly. Do I rightly understand that it is >> Hannes' who is to choose the new maintainers? It must be difficult to >> choose, knowing little about us volunteers. Can we progress by having >> each of the volunteers work on one of the current bugs? That would >> usefully fix some bugs, give us volunteers experience of the work and >> inform Hannes about our capabilities. >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe, send mail to 981446-unsubscr...@bugs.debian.org. >> >
