Your message dated Sat, 19 Jun 2021 10:42:44 +0000
with message-id <87v96a9lus....@piedmont.edu>
and subject line Re: RFS: r-cran-mathjaxr
has caused the Debian Bug report #990033,
regarding ITP: r-cran-mathjaxr -- use MathJax in R documentation files
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
990033: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=990033
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Doug Torrance <dtorra...@piedmont.edu>
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, dtorra...@piedmont.edu
* Package name : r-cran-mathjaxr
Version : 1.4-0
Upstream Author : Wolfgang Viechtbauer <w...@wvbauer.com>
* URL : https://github.com/wviechtb/mathjaxr
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: R
Description : use MathJax in R documentation files
Provides 'MathJax' and macros to enable its use within Rd files for
rendering equations in the HTML help files.
I intend to maintain this package as a member of the Debian R Packages
Maintainers team.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Fri 18 Jun 2021 12:57:22 PM EDT, Nilesh Patra wrote:
On 6/18/21 8:12 PM, Torrance, Douglas wrote:
I've finished packaging mathjaxr, which lets R package authors use MathJax for
displaying math in html documentation. I patched it to use the Debian
libjs-mathjax package instead of upstream's embedded copy of MathJax.
Would anyone be able to review/sponsor?
https://salsa.debian.org/r-pkg-team/r-cran-mathjaxr
Argh! Looks like this is already in the archive, see here[1]
and the original ITP[2]
Oh my goodness -- how embarrassing! I must have added this to my TODO list
before the original was uploaded and never bothered to double check before I
started working on it...
Looks like we had a redundant packaging effort unfortunately, but no worries :)
Please consider to close your ITP for this one, and let me know if it is OK for
me
to remove the corresponding repository from salsa
Yes, please do. Thank you!
Doug
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---