On Wed, 2003-07-30 at 19:20, Dave Rolsky wrote: > On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Jay Bonci wrote: > > > I'm currently working on getting alzabo into the Debian GNU/Linux > > distribution. It depends on Class::Factory::Util, as you know, which > > will end up as it's own package. > > Cool, this means I won't have to figure out how to do it!
Yeah, it's going to be a little tricky. I just got Module::Build in the
archive, so it shouldn't be too bad. I'm looking into a patch for
Build.PL and/or Alzabo::Build that would allow the specification of
paths and question answers either in %ENV vars, or preferably on the
command line. I'll pass along a patch when I have one ready.
> > I would assume that all of your perl modules are licensed "same as
> > perl" (most are listed as such on your CPAN page), but I just want to
> > clarify that with you for Class::Factory::Util before we go distributing
> > your module.
>
> Yep, all my modules are same as Perl itself.
Great, thanks for clarifying.
> > Also, in the manpage, should it say " use CLass::Factory::Util" instead
> > of "use Class::Util". Is that intentional, or from an older version of
> > the module?
>
> Sounds like a bug.
>
> I'll release a new version that includes a LICENSE file and fixes the
> docs.
Okay, I'll wait for your changed upstream, and get that one packaged up.
--jay
cc'ed the alzabo ITP
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
