[2019-02-18 20:42] "Adam D. Barratt" <a...@adam-barratt.org.uk>
> part text/plain 906
> On Mon, 2019-02-18 at 19:37 +0000, Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
> > * Package name : build-alternative
> > Version : 0.0.1
> > Upstream Author : Dmitry Bogatov <kact...@debian.org>
> > * Url : https://salsa.debian.org/kaction/build-alternative
> >
>
> How well tested is the package? From a quick look at the Debianization:
This package itself is week old. It is intended to provide central point
for code, related to dietlibc, that I keep copying from package to
package since 2016.
> <quote>
> Package: build-alternative
> Architecture: all
> Depends:
> ${misc:Depends},
> dietlibc-dev (>= 0.34~cvs20160606-3) [alpha amd64 arm64 armeb armel armhf
> hppa i386 mips mipsel mips64el power
> pc powerpcspe ppc64 ppc64el s390x sparc64 x32],
> </quote>
>
> That combination is explicitly forbidden by Policy, and will not
> produce a useful result. (See https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/
> ch-relationships.html#syntax-of-relationship-fields , specifically the
> paragraph beginning "[f]or binary relationship fields".)
I see. I need to make it `Architecture: any'. Thank you. Anything else?
--
Note, that I send and fetch email in batch, once every 24 hours.
If matter is urgent, try https://t.me/kaction
--
