[2018-10-27 17:28] Andreas Henriksson <andr...@fatal.se> > [...]
> Also working towards using the debian/sysvinit repo would likely > be a good move. It seems like you're using a -guest account on > salsa, but at the same time you're a DD?! You should have an > account on salsa matching your debian username (kaction?) which will > allow you full access to debian/sysvinit. Try using that. Thank you. I used my @kaction account on salsa, and now it worked. So now sources of 2.88dsf-60 are on `master' branch on `debian/sysvinit' repository. > I'd like to suggest you put the alioth mailinglist back as maintainer > and put yourself as uploader. That will allow casual bystanders to > have a chance to follow progress from the sidelines (and hopefully > that way build up an interest in stepping in). If you want to > aquire admin access to the mailing list, that can probably be > arranged by contacting either Ian Jackson or pere. Seems like a good idea. So, I made two commits on top of debian/2.88dsf-60, that bring back Uploaders and make Vcs-* fields point to common debian/sysvinit repository. Did not upload yet, but Ian, if you want -- go ahead. > > [Dmitry Bogatov] > > Oh, and surely, while I did my best to not introduce any functional > > changes in 2.89-60, brave souls to test upload are more then welcome. > Unfortunately you seem to have been a little to eager with > "(lintian?) cleanups" where you broke a few things. > Please remember to always decide for yourself rather than listen > to what lintian has to say. Lintian is usually good at "regular" > packages but very often wrong about "special" packages (like sysvinit, > et.al.). Also always be very careful and understand all possible > consequenses when changing LSB headers in central init scripts. > [...] > > You might want to consider reverting all the LSB header changes and > adding lintian overrides where needed instead. You are right. I am sorry about being so reckless to upload. I made a commits, that revert changes to LSB headers and add Lintian overrides instead. They are on `wip/revert-lsb-headers', to allow clean metainfo-only upload from `master' branch. > PS. I'm personally looking forward to a fix for #799329 finally being > incorporated. That'll make helping out with testing easier. Moved this bug upper in my todo list :)
