-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Tamas Nagy wrote: > Dear Joe, Hello Tamas,
> Jan, 23 you posted a debian bug report about ol2mbox. I would be curious > what happened since that time on ol2mbox packaging. Recently I submitted > a similar feature request to KMailCVT, up to now without success. Sorry that I've been MIA about this, I've been very busy at my day job recently... I am almost done with packaging readpst, I just need to find half an hour to write a manpage for readpstlog...maybe tonight. > Is there any on-going effort to provide Outlook PST conversion or any > active development on LibPST? AFAIK, Dave has pretty much ceased working on libpst...Though he can probably speak to this better than I can. > PS: Is there any legal issue on this? If yes, what's the difference > between reverse engineering of a .doc file and a .pst file? I don't see any nor do I have any knowledge of why there might be a legal issue with readpst. Then again, IANAL. I will post to debian-legal when the package is complete asking their opinion on this matter. Thanks for the prodding! Joe Nahmias, DD wannabe -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+nBK6Kl23+OYWEqURAn+GAJ960I9/g80O4o1D/qARjRGePDmqWgCgy7Wg JhPy2NbFHd2ULGT+LGT+M/w= =sPJ3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
