Hi all, First of all, thanks Raphaël and Sophie for working on PySide2 packaging!
On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 10:25:57AM +0200, Maximiliano Curia wrote: > > Should it go in "Qt" or "Qt extras"? It's going to be something official by > > the upstream Qt project so I think that "Qt" might be good. > > Right, but please take into account that the packages maintained under the > qt tree use a debian directory only packaging branch, and in general, they > use all the same packaging structure (no dpm, no upstream branches or tags > in the public repos, etc). This set of rules is more relaxed in qt-extras > and kde-extras. It looks like pyside2 will use the same release cycle as Qt uses, so we will most likely have to update it together with the other Qt modules. It would be a bit easier for us if you put it into the Qt namespace and followed our packaging scheme (debian/ only repository), but Qt extras and whatever repo structure should work too. > Also, I don't see in the bug log any comment about the current pyside > maintenance, are the pyside maintainers ok with moving the new version of > the project to a different repository in a different team? As far as I know, there are no current pyside 1.x maintainers. So there is nobody who can complain about this move. -- Dmitry Shachnev
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
