* Ralf Nolden ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Friday 04 April 2003 11:31, Colin Watson wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 10:46:32AM +0200, Ralf Nolden wrote: > > > Package: wnpp > > > Version: N/A; reported 2003-04-04 > > > Severity: wishlist > > > > > > * Package name : png2ico > > > Version : 2002-12-08 > > > Upstream Author : Matthias S. Benkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > * URL : http://www.winterdrache.de/freeware > > > * License : GPL > > > Description : a png to windows ico converter program > > > > icotool, from the icoutils package, can already do this job ... how is > > png2ico superior/different? > > Then why does Debian include the number of x mailservers and y mailreaders if > postfix / mutt is doing the job as well ?
He asked what was superior/different between icoutils and png2ico. He
didn't say it shouldn't go in or that there was any problem with it. If
it doesn't do anything different one might wonder about the point of
including it. Obviously mutt and elm are quite different in a number of
ways, as are exim and sendmail, etc.
Are you getting defensive so quickly because there is no difference?
Stephen
pgpmoti9uMRsw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
