Hi, Sébastien Villemot a écrit le 02/11/2017 à 17:41 : > Hi Julien, > > On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 05:23:04PM +0100, Julien Puydt wrote: > >> wnpp-alert showed me scilab was 'O', so I came to look ; from what I see >> on bug #744140 : >> - Sylvestre put it under RFH and as nobody answered, proceeded to O. >> - Wolfgang came in to ITA, got sidetracked ; >> - Wolfgang came back, created the git repo, got sidetracked ; >> >> but in fact, looking at the git repo and the package page: >> - the git repo hasn't been touched since more than a year ; >> - the svn repo got regular contribution and is used to maintain the >> package by several people (Gilles Filippini and Sébastien Villemot) >> under the Debian Science Team umbrella. >> >> Finally the upstream homepage says 6.0.0 is out since february. >> >> So my questions are: >> - is it O or not? >> - who's working on packaging 6.0.0? >> - is it normal that a package under the Debian Science Team umbrella >> still uses svn? > > I indeed made a few contributions to scilab, but limited to QA work. > > I don’t intend to do the usual maintenance work, nor am I working on packaging > 6.0. So I should not be counted in.
Same as Sébastien here. Thanks, _g.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
