Hi Ralf, On 2017-10-25 23:25, Ralf Jung wrote: > What is the reason for using "dino-im" rather than "dino" as the package > name? > > There is no package "dino" in stable nor testing nor unstable.
This is not sufficient: BTS, tracker etc. still know about dino. The same applies to tools used by our derivatives, e.g. Ubuntu. Package names are like atomic waste with long half-life period. See https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2017/10/msg00355.html for details. Cheers
