Hi, On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 04:08:18PM +0000, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > We packaged the following specifically as LXD dependencies which did go in: > > * https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/golang-gopkg-flosch-pongo2.v3 > * https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/golang-petname > (possibly others, hit-list was at https://wiki.debian.org/LXD)
Thanks for that! > IMHO, and at least for the ones I did, I think we should file RC bugs to > prevent these packages from going into stretch. They should stay in the > archive/sid, for continued work on LXD, but I don't think that they are > valuable on their own in the next release: it's just stuff that people > might try to use that isn't being looked after properly (since the reason > for them being there does not exist), taking up archive space and apt > metadata space, etc. Makes sense, yeah. I will try to have a look at LXD during the credativ BSP this weekend, noone says BSPs are limited to non-wnpp bugs :) Cheers Evgeni
