Andreas Tille writes ("Re: Trademark issues (Was:
kronatools_2.7+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED)"):
> I admit I feel a bit blocked. Should I simply upload with another
> possibly improperly choosen name and wait for ftpmaster comments to the
> upload in new? It seems this topic does not deserve any additional
> input and thus I might take this potential detour without further
> discussion. :-(
Earlier you wrote this:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 09:21:06PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > I think radiant-graphs might come closer even if I doubt that there is
> > much confusion between the CMS and this tool and if its not packaged
> > there should be no clash.
> >
> > I'd like to hear a word from ftpmaster if I rename the source and binary
> > package as well as the Git archive - would this be accepted for the next
> > upload. Some kind of confirmation in advance would be helpful to do
> > more negotions right now and not after another round in the new queue.
Debian is supposedly a do-ocracy. You have consulted. In the absence
of objections you should carry on.
IMO you should upload with the name `radiant-graphs'. If that is
rejected by ftpmaster you should involve the DPL and/or the TC.
Ian.
--
Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> These opinions are my own.
If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is
a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.
