On Sun, Jan 01, 2017 at 05:38:50PM +0100, Evgeni Golov wrote: > Ohai, > > On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 01:07:44PM -0500, Harlan Lieberman-Berg wrote: > > "W. Martin Borgert" <deba...@debian.org> writes: > > > Then why not make an additional binary package from the same > > > source package? This way ansible and its documentation would > > > not get out of sync. > > > > Unfortunately, we don't build ansible off of the git repository, but > > rather from the released tarballs. (The version in upstream's git > > requires much more extensive dfsg cleanup, and would until recently have > > required the bundling of multiple upstream repositories together.) > > Actually, I think building from a release tarball is a good thing. This > ensures that every distro has the same Ansible. > > > It's been a while since we made the decision not to pull from upstream's > > git; Toni, I'd be happy to work with you on seeing if it's doable now. > > How about we talk to upstream to actually include the docs in the tarballs? > That should not be that hard. > > Then we can build and ship them and everyone wins?
Let's continue here: https://github.com/ansible/ansible/issues/19769
