Dear Till, >> Didier 'OdyX' Raboud <o...@debian.org> wrote: >> > Le jeudi, 8 décembre 2016, 09.34:12 h CET Didier 'OdyX' Raboud a écrit : >> > > * In CUPS, the PPD makes the manufacturer appear as "(Fuji Xerox)", >> > > "Fuji Xerox" and "FX", and only as "Fuji Xerox" Model. There should >> > > really exist a fxlinuxprint.drv as source for that PPD. >> > >> > The really better solution is: >> > - (Optionally) a fxlinuxprint.drv exists, and generates … >> > - one PPD per supported printer, with uniform and coherent Manufacturer >> > names >> I admit I don't understand much here. >> If you can provide an example, that would be helpful and appreciated. > > Well. This is something for upstream, really. I'll let Till provide an > example, he's much more knowledgeable in this area.
If you can kindly help to give me the example mentioned above, it'd be appreciated. Besides, you seems to be in ubuntu community, so could you help to handle this: - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/124442 It's already hit ubuntu so I think that bug can be closed. Thank you! Cheers, -- Roger Shimizu, GMT +9 Tokyo PGP/GPG: 4096R/6C6ACD6417B3ACB1