Your message dated Mon, 3 Feb 2003 14:00:52 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line You opened a new bug instead of retitling the existing one
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Jan 2003 02:37:31 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 09 20:37:29 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mta5.rcsntx.swbell.net [151.164.30.29]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18Wp33-0005Aq-00; Thu, 09 Jan 2003 20:37:29 -0600
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([65.66.209.9]) by mta5.rcsntx.swbell.net
(iPlanet Messaging Server 5.1 HotFix 1.6 (built Oct 18 2002))
with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 09 Jan 2003 20:37:13 -0600 (CST)
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2003 20:37:10 -0600
From: William Ferris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: adopt upsd
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.5
Content-type: text/plain
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0
tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2003-01-07
Severity: normal
retitle 86242 ITA: upsd -- UPS Monitor Program
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 176079-done) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Feb 2003 13:01:00 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 03 07:01:00 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18fgDb-0007Gm-00; Mon, 03 Feb 2003 07:01:00 -0600
Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10)
id A9F5726BCA; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 13:56:40 +0100 (CET)
Received: by regression.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 8F6BE2356A; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 14:00:52 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 14:00:52 +0100
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: You opened a new bug instead of retitling the existing one
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.2 required=5.0
tests=SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,
USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| retitle 86242 ITA: upsd -- UPS Monitor Program
This caused the Bug Tracking System to open a new bug. You have to
send control messages to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read
http://bugs.debian.org and http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp
I'm closing the new bug; please retitle the existing bug. Also, why
do you intend to adopt upsd? I hear NUT is much better.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
