On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 05:31:40PM +0100, Daniel Stender wrote: > I haven't discussed this yet with the ITP holder (busy), but as foreseeable > sponsor and > reporter of this bug I say that's all right. We could name the source package > that way, > no problem.
Sorry for the delay. Yes, of course I will change the name of the package if there is a conflict with the name of another project. Thanks for pointing this out to me. Kind regards, Fabian
