Hello Carsten, Thanks for reminding me this ITP request.
Yes, I have succeeded to make some progress with Baculum deb packages. To be honest, I didn't start unbundling PHP framework which Baculum uses and in consequence I didn't report ITP about the PHP framework. The progress is that I prepared official deb and rpm repositories to use from bacula.org. Here is info in documentation about it: http://www.bacula.org/7.4.x-manuals/en/console/Baculum_Web_GUI_Tool.html For now I prefer to provide Baculum packages this way. When something will change please be sure that I inform here about it. I reported this ITP to add Baculum to Debian and to make it slightly more popular. Now I think that in current Baculum state the repository on bacula.org is sufficient for Baculum. It seems to me that good application doesn't require too much advertisements and I think that better when it comes natural and without forcing it. Second reason is that to develop Baculum and to make Baculum better I need to prepare some useful functionalities. When I focus on packaging Baculum in Debian, I have less time for developing new features. I think that Debian package maintainers will do it better than I. You can close this ITP requires if you want. I am not sure what is the procedure for this type of cases. Best regards. Marcin Haba On 15.09.2016 16:34, Carsten Leonhardt wrote: > Hi Marcin, > > it's been a while since we last heard of each other, have you succeeded > in making any progress here? > > - Carsten >
