Hi! Is someone from the PkgPrivacyMaintainers team interested / willing to help get corridor [4] [5] [6] into Debian?
I got a working prototype of a Debian package which is almost free of lintian warnings. [1] [2] [3] There are just some remaining --pedantic lintian warnings that are fixable. First questions... 1) I: corridor source: unused-file-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright paragraph at line 3 https://github.com/adrelanos/corridor/blob/debian_new/debian/copyright Any idea what is wrong in the debian/copyright file? 2) Would a combined manpage, i.e. 'man corridor', symlinked to the individual command names (corridor-init-forwarding, corridor-init-snat, ...) be acceptable by Debian policy and otherwise or should a separate man page per binary be provided? Cheers, Patrick (Sorry for breaking the thread and re-posting this. I was signed up to Pkg-anonymity-tools, but not yet to pkg-privacy-maintainers. I thought by replying to the RFP bug, my reply would get cc'd here which it did not. And I never figured out how to manually figure out a mailing list reference number and replicate it so that the thread does not break.) [1] https://github.com/rustybird/corridor/issues/10 [2] https://github.com/adrelanos/corridor/tree/debian_new [3] hhtts://github.com/rustybird/corridor/compare/master...adrelanos:debian_new?expand=1 [4] https://github.com/rustybird/corridor [5] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-privacy-maintainers/Week-of-Mon-20160704/000814.html [6] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=829740
