Ghislain Vaillant <ghisv...@gmail.com> writes: > May I suggest to rename the source package to python-bitstruct as it > seems to be the (unofficial) convention for Python-only library.
Tends to be a bit inconsistant. Looking at Debian Python Modules Team there are a lot of packages that don't do this. > FYI, we already have python-bitarray and python-bitstring available in > the archive. Perhaps, it would be nice to emphasize what makes this > library different for the other two, although I understand that the > motivation behind this packaging effort is to satisfy a Build-Depends. Comparison with python-bitarray is easy - This is a native Python implementation. I suspect the major difference is that they were libraries written by different authors with different aims as to what they wanted to archive. I haven't used any of these libraries, don't think I can really compare them :-( -- Brian May <b...@debian.org>
