Hi, Thorsten Glaser wrote, > On Sun, 17 Jan 2016, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote: > > > uClibc-ng is a small C library for developing embedded Linux systems. It is > > much smaller than the GNU C Library, but nearly all applications supported > > by > > glibc also work perfectly with uClibc-ng. > > How is that relevant for a binary distribution in which nothing will > use this package? For cross-compiling, you only need the source code > available. Also, µClibc is of so bad quality that, on MMU targets, > musl is in all cases the better alternative.
It is a try to build a Debian system with an alternative C library as Musl or uClibc-ng. More users of uClibc-ng will allow to get the quality better. There is still no support for M68k, MIPS64, ARC or Xtensa. Why not allowing a small Debian distro maybe without systemd to exist? > Full disclosure: I do have commits in µClibc-ng. So you can further help to get stuff going ;) best regards Waldemar
