On 14120 March 1977, Iain R. Learmonth wrote: > It is worth noting that live-build is not a Debian project, it is an > external project that claims to be an official Debian project. This is > something that needs to be fixed.
It is worth noting that you do not declare such things. Such an attitude is just plain wrong. It is as official a package in Debian as any other, and we have been respectful with namespaces on replacing them. At a minimum people got approached before. > I'm aware that I'm going to be upsetting people, but this has been a long > time coming and I'm not going to spend time bikeshedding over naming. As an ftpmaster I can tell you that you will have to spend more time on bikeshedding over the name. live-build-ng wont fly. > I would rather spend that time on integration of live image creation > into official Debian infrastructure and building the best system for > live image creation possible. You would have spent WAY less time on this if you wouldn't have started out entirely negative here. -- bye, Joerg Siliziumdioxid wird auf offenen LKWs durch Deutschland gefahren! Der Sauerstoffgehalt der Atmosphaere ist auf 21% gesunken!
