Hello, I've made the requested changes to pbalign. Could someone please sponsor?
Thanks and regards Afif On الأحد 6 أيلول 2015 10:15, Afif Elghraoui wrote: > Hi, Andreas, > > On الأحد 6 أيلول 2015 06:27, Andreas Tille wrote: >> On Sun, Sep 06, 2015 at 02:13:12AM -0700, Afif Elghraoui wrote: >> >>> The binary package is still called python-pbalign >>> because it does include public python modules.. >> >> Does not sound logical. Assume there might be some python3-pbalign >> sooner or later. Then you want to provide both python-pbalign and >> python3-pbalign. Where do you want to put the scripts then? So if you >> ask me spliting the commandline tools to a separate package pbalign >> would be the best solution even now. >> > > I thought about this, but the reason I didn't do it is that the scripts > are basically just wrappers around the library. A python3 version would > then have its own version of the scripts. > > I suppose this could be made to work by making the pbalign package > depend on python-pbalign, which would contain the libraries, while then > ignoring any of the scripts from a python3 version of the package. I > like this way better because the use case of the package as a library is > a very uncommon one-- and the API is not really documented, either. All > documentation is for the command-line use case. > > So I'll try this and report back. > -- Afif Elghraoui | عفيف الغراوي http://afif.ghraoui.name
