On Mon, 27 Jul 2015 11:37:14 +0200 Marcin Mielniczuk <marmis...@inboxalias.com> wrote:
[...] > * Package name : down > Version : 1.0.0 > Upstream Author : Yutaka Hara <yutaka.hara+...@gmail.com> > * URL : http://route477.net The page by that URL does not mention the project you intend to package. Or at least I failed to locate it there. > * License : MIT > Programming Lang: Ruby/SDL > Description : A simple game written in Ruby/SDL "written in Ruby/SDL" is implementation specific and has nothing to do with package's description. Please be more descriptive and concrete. Supposedly something like "An Icy Tower-like game which can be played downwards" might be just OK. The general rule of thumb for writing a package's description is that it should deliver as much as possible information to a *previously uninformed* user. The user which looks for games is not concerned with which software stack was used for development, but should receive a clear hint of what this game is about just from looking at its description in the list their software package manager presents them with. > Did you ever play Icy Tower? Did you ever have the opportunity to > play it downwards? Now you have! The extended description could supposedly be toned down a bit, and then extended. Please understand that you're not a marketologist or advertisement specialist here, and your task is not about raising an excitement of a potential customer by any means. Luckily, we don't sell, we just deliver. ;-) [...] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150727132226.18182643f1d1d3faa0721...@domain007.com
