On Sun, 26 Jul 2015 10:52:13 -0300 "Lisandro =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dami=E1n_Nicanor_P=E9rez?= Meyer" <perezme...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sunday 26 July 2015 12:42:56 MichaÅ Milanowski wrote: > > Can't any debian dev see his stupidity regarding to this issue? There are > > tons of qt4 apps that are widely used and will be probably never ported to > > qt5, like Skype for example, but many others too. > > Hi! I'm the Qt maintainer, and yes, I understand your arguments, but again: do > you really want to push dead-upstream code and support it trough the whole > life of Stretch? I don't.
Your argument is that of principles against usability. People USE Debian. The principles are important, of course, but as far as they don't interfere with usability. You speak about "dead code" as if Qt4 has totally disappeared. As you know, there are and will be so many Qt4 apps. Porting to Qt5 is a good advice but, here again, an advice against usability?! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/10993938.P9yh6okobB@debian
