Hi Michael,
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 01:19:53AM -0400, Michael Prisant wrote:
> Perhaps king-suitename and king-probe would be good names for the packages
> (or suitename-king. and probe-king) Clearly the probe executable can't be
> called probe because as Andreas has pointed out this name is already in
> use. But I like the admittedly inconsistent idea of retaining the
> suitename executable name because at least that change won't need to be
> propagated into the King source.
>
> A possible added advantage of this type of naming would be to differentiate
> between the program version found on the kinemage site which are suitable
> as both standalone and king callable and the the latest versions in the
> rlabduke repo at github which may or may not be king-callable.
>
> I'll try to see if I can get a word regarding strong preference from the
> authorship group and if successful forward their preference to this list.
OK. So lets wait for a response from upstream authors.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150723074520.ge11...@an3as.eu
