Hi,
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 05:18:04PM +0200, Marcin Dulak wrote:
> > tasks (which does not mean that I will refuse SoB for sure ;-)).
>
> we have discussed the reason why gpaw-setups (gpaw-data) should be shipped
> by Debian.
> The discussion starts here:
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-science/2015/07/msg00033.html
> I can add that the potentials included in gpaw-data can be also read by
> Abinit.
OK, I'll upload the current state of Git.
> OK thanks. There is a new GPAW release (just today), but this requires
> python-ase-3.9.0 which
May be you file a bug report (severity wishlist) against python-ase "new
upstream version available". When doing so it might be sensible to
suggest maintenance in the Debian Science team. This would enable us
to act more quickly and do a team upload of the package.
> is not in Debian yet. gpaw-data (or gpaw-setups) stays the old one.
> I think we just continue with GPAW-0.10.0 and make package update later.
As I said before: No new Python 2 only packages will pass the new
queue without any additional information.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150722162844.gm9...@an3as.eu
