Hello! Is there a reason why the packaging is taking so long?
I have recently stumbled across simplescreenrecorder and inititally packaged it as 'ssr' first. Then upstream told me he prefers a long package name (I'd rather find this package name to be bulky and way too long, but anyway) and I changed the name which then showed me the other, this ITP bug on my QA page. My package is, in fact, already ready and I even had already uploaded it to NEW until I requested a removal to change the name. I'm wondering why Maarten didn't tell me there was another packaging effort in Debian going on, he must have completely forgotten about it. Anyway, did you guys test the package on non-Linux kernels and non-x86 platforms? Because ALSA doesn't work on non-Linux kernels at the moment and the glinject library works on x86 only due to the fact that eflhacks is x86-only. I have take these issues into consideration and adapted my package source accordingly. I have set myself as the owner as Ho Wan Chan hasn't replied to this bug report for more than a year and we usually change the ITP to RFP in these cases to allow others to work on the package. My package is solely missing the manpage for the simplescreensaver command. The glinject doesn't really need a manpage as it is an internal command of simplescreensaver and isn't used outside of it. Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/554b06f0.7040...@physik.fu-berlin.de
