Hello, * On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 02:54:19PM +0200 John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On 05/05/2015 02:17 PM, Oliver Schmidt wrote: > Uhm, I think you are taking this way too serious. I don't think that > anyone who ever contributed to cc65 besides Ullrich and John would not > agree to have the code fully covered under the Zlib license. And most > of the code was rewritten anyway according to Ullrich von Bassewitz and > all of what was rewritten was licensed under the Zlib.
Please note that Uz insisted on any contribution to cc65 to be licensed under zlib license. Thus, the only parts and contributions that might not fall under zlib are the parts that were there when Uz took over the project. Thus, it does not make any sense to contact any contributor to cc65 in the time frame when Uz was the head of the project, because there, we can be sure that any contribution actually *IS* zlib. Have a look at "Patch Acceptance Policy" on http://www.cc65.org/oldindex.php#Contribs Regards, Spiro. -- Spiro R. Trikaliotis http://www.trikaliotis.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150505184248.ga6...@hermes.local.trikaliotis.net
