Le jeu. 30 avr. 2015 à 17:42, Scott Kitterman <deb...@kitterman.com> a écrit :
> On Thursday, April 30, 2015 05:13:03 PM Olivier Sallou wrote: > > Package: wnpp > > Severity: wishlist > > Owner: Olivier Sallou <osal...@debian.org> > > > > * Package name : python-obitools > > Version : 1.1.16 > > Upstream Author : Eric Coissac > > * URL : http://metabarcoding.org//obitools/ > > * License : CeCILL-V2 > > Programming Lang: Python > > Description : set of programs specifically designed for analyzing > NGS > > data in a DNA metabarcoding contex > > > > The OBITools package is a set of programs specifically designed for > > analyzing NGS data in a DNA metabarcoding context, taking into account > > taxonomic information. OBITools enrich the Unix command line interface > with > > a set of new commands dedicated to NGS data processing. Most of them > have a > > name starting with the obi prefix. They automatically recognize the input > > file format amongst most of the standard sequence file formats (i.e. > fasta, > > fastq, EMBL, and GenBank formats). Nevertheless, options are available to > > enforce some format specificity such as the encoding system used in fastq > > files for quality codes. Most of the basic Unix commands have their > > OBITools equivalent (e.g. obihead vs head, obitail vs tail, obigrep vs > > grep), which is convenient for scientists familiar with Unix. The main > > difference between any standard Unix command and its OBITools counterpart > > is that the treatment unit is no longer the text line but the sequence > > record. As a sequence record is more complex than a single text line, the > > OBITools programs have many supplementary options compared to their Unix > > equivalents. > > According to the trove information on pypi [1] this is python only, not > python3. We were hoping to not increase the amount of python packages > needing > porting to python3. Have you discussed python3 plans with upstream? > Nope, not yet. However, as I discussed with one guy of the team some time ago, I do not think there is any plan to go to python3. This is an academic tool, and very often, they only focus on getting something working and base maintenance. I understand the need to plan python3 switch, however we cannot block tools used by the community. I will ask upstream anyway. > Scott K > > [1] https://pypi.python.org/pypi/OBITools/1.1.16 > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: https://lists.debian.org/21039320.xThH8BtM62@kitterma-e6430 > >
