Hello, I am working on Debian meta files for Baculum. As I said, I let know about current progress.
Today I built new packages from git snapshot. My current changes are here: https://launchpad.net/~ganiuszka/+archive/ubuntu/baculum/+packages I am moving forward, but I guess that there is still something to do. Please let me know if are needed some additional information about Baculum. Best regards. Marcin Haba On 13.03.2015 04:10, Marcin Haba wrote: > Hello, > > I am working on adjusting Baculum files to Debian requirements. > > I am preparing project for Debian Jessie. Here you can see current state > of sources: > > https://launchpad.net/~ganiuszka/+archive/ubuntu/baculum/+files/baculum_7.0%2Bgit20150208ppa1~jessie1.tar.xz > > On Jessie environment I have following warnings from Lintian (with my > comments): > > W: baculum source: package-needs-versioned-debhelper-build-depends 9 > > I need to read more about this dependency. > > W: baculum: extra-license-file > usr/share/baculum/htdocs/framework/3rdParty/FirePHPCore/LICENSE > W: baculum: extra-license-file > usr/share/baculum/htdocs/framework/3rdParty/Markdown/License.text > W: baculum: extra-license-file > usr/share/baculum/htdocs/framework/3rdParty/Parsedown/LICENSE.txt > W: baculum: extra-license-file > usr/share/baculum/htdocs/framework/3rdParty/ReCaptcha/LICENSE > W: baculum: extra-license-file > usr/share/baculum/htdocs/framework/3rdParty/SafeHtml/license.txt > W: baculum: extra-license-file > usr/share/baculum/htdocs/framework/3rdParty/TinyMCE/license.txt > W: baculum: extra-license-file > usr/share/baculum/htdocs/framework/I18N/core/data/license.txt > > All files from directory /framework/ are PRADO Framework files. I would > avoid a lot of framework modifications if they are not really needed. In > reasonable cases I am able to change something in framework and add > patch(es). I this case they are licenses files, trivial issue, I think. > > As I wrote previous, I have never added new packages to distribution. I > rely on your opinions and advises. > > W: baculum: embedded-javascript-library > usr/share/baculum/htdocs/framework/Web/Javascripts/source/prototype-1.7/prototype.js > please use libjs-prototype > > PRADO Framework contains integrated Prototype.js library. It could be a > bit painful change, because of nested integration Prototype.js with > framework, but I am able to change it. > > W: baculum: embedded-javascript-library > usr/share/baculum/htdocs/framework/Web/Javascripts/source/scriptaculous-1.9.0/scriptaculous.js > please use libjs-scriptaculous > > The same thing like with Prototype.js, Scriptaculous.js is internal tool > from framework. Possible to change. > > W: baculum: extra-license-file > usr/share/baculum/htdocs/framework/Web/Javascripts/source/tinymce-405/license.txt > > Next license file. TinyMCE Editor from framework is not used at all by > Baculum. All TinyMCE implementation as module to framework could be removed. > > W: baculum: embedded-javascript-library > usr/share/baculum/htdocs/framework/Web/Javascripts/source/tinymce-405/plugins/compat3x/tiny_mce_popup.js > please use tinymce2? > > To remove as above. > > W: baculum: duplicate-font-file > usr/share/baculum/htdocs/framework/Web/UI/WebControls/assets/verase.ttf > also in ttf-bitstream-vera > > Next framework element - TrueType font. > ===== > > That are all warnings that Lintian shown. > > From other things, I moved location of Baculum scripts from /var/www to > /usr/share/baculum/htdocs/, because Lintian indicated me that it is not > good choice. > > BTW: I noticed that Lintian from Jessie is more restrictive than that > from Ubuntu. > > I will back when I have something new. > > Best regards. > Marcin Haba > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/550728b6.4060...@bacula.pl
