On Thursday, February 5, 2015, Roelof Berg <rb...@berg-solutions.de> wrote:
> Thanks for the links and the welcoming words. This is the motivation I > need :) I'm currently busy with making my .deb package compatible to > launchpad ppa as a quality measure. > Great! (-: > > Am I allowed to use full optimization (-Ofast) ? Or is it mandatory to use > -O2 ? > Per https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html -- there's a lot in 10.1, but it concludes, "It is up to the package maintainer to decide what compilation options are best for the package." So -- go for it. But preferably run some benchmarks to find out if this actually makes a difference! > > I hope, this will find a sponsor. I contacted the Imagemagick package > maintainers at first, before I submit a sponsorship-request. Wish me luck :) > Great! >
