Your message dated Sat, 11 Oct 2014 17:57:48 +0200
with message-id <20141011155748.ga5...@jwilk.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#612694: scanbd has hit unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #612694,
regarding RFP: scanmonitord -- scanner button daemon
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
612694: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=612694
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jakub Wilk <jw...@debian.org>

* Package name    : scanmonitord
  Version         : 1.2.6
  Upstream Author : Simon Matter <simon.mat...@invoca.ch>
* URL             : http://www.invoca.ch/pub/packages/scanmonitord/
* License         : GPLv2+
  Programming Lang: C, bash
  Description     : scanner button daemon

Scanmonitord is a daemon which runs device monitors on one or more devices. Every button or sensor event is then evaluated by user generated action scripts which can itself call whatever system command they want. For postprocessing scanned images, scanmonitord has the ability to start image processing scripts as daemons which can automate additional actions like OCR on scanned images by user defined scripts.

(The above description was copied verbatim from upstream README. The actual package description will be likely different.)

--
Jakub Wilk



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
* Rolf Leggewie <debian-b...@rolf.leggewie.biz>, 2014-10-11, 23:39:
scanbd has made it to unstable today and I believe it obsoletes both scanmonitord as well as scanbuttond. Have a look if you like.

I no longer have any interest scanmonitord[0], and I don't think we need 3 different scanner button daemons in the archive. So let's close this bug.


[0] I use this for scanning instead, which has built-in support for buttons:
http://jwilk.net/software/scanhelper

--
Jakub Wilk

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to