On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 10:37:47PM +0200, W. Martin Borgert wrote: > > On 2014-10-08 20:25, Matija Nalis wrote: > > > there is also a need for python-pyld (which doesn't exist at all in > > It's in unstable now, so I assume no dependencies of mediagoblin > 0.7.1 are missing from Debian, rigth? > What else stops mediagoblin from entering the NEW queue? :~)
Wow, thanks for quick work! Yes, with that two packages in, not much remains for Simon or you (or someone) to make package ready is really 4 things... 3 very trivial things (meaning I managed to do them without problems): - get last pristine 0.7.1 and 'uupdate -u' version from http://mentors.debian.net/package/mediagoblin to it - remove obsolete 0001-Fix-Babel-version-restriction.-Onward-and-upward.patch - add dependencies on python-unidecode, new python-exif and python-pyld and 1 just-a-little-less-trivial (at least for someone who is not into python installing stuff very much - like myself): making few more files get where they need to be in package. Most importantly, I needed to do: mkdir -p /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/mediagoblin/static/metadata cp mediagoblin/static/metadata/rdfa11.jsonld /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/mediagoblin/static/metadata/rdfa11.jsonld after installation for package to get it to work. It should go there by itself, but there is too much python & dh automagic for me to see how anything goes anywhere (good ol' makefiles were sooo nice :) (note: there seem to be few more files that I found in static which don't go into package but probably should: extlib/tinymce/js/tinymce/tinymce.min.js css/extlib/skeleton.css fonts/Lato-Regular.ttf but they do not seem to be critical, as everything seems to work quite nicely for me even without them being installed - you can see the package 0.7.1 built and installed as described working at http://media.mnalis.com/ as proof of concept) After that, package builds and works nicely (after being setup as described in README.Debian) on jessie. Sure it would be nice if few of those things in README.Debian were (semi)automated, but none of that should block package entering NEW AFAICT, so it would be great if it could there soon (like, in time for upcoming jessie freeze)! Thanks again for taking action on this! -- Opinions above are GNU-copylefted. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141011005231.ga23...@c3po.home.lan
