Hello, On Fri, 05 Sep 2014 18:57:50 +0200 Michael Gruenewald <michip...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > Owner: Michael Gruenewald <michip...@gmail.com> > > * Package name : bsdowl > Version : 2.2.1 > Upstream Author : Michael Gruenewald <michip...@gmail.com> > * URL : https://bitbucket.org/michipili/bsdowl > * License : CeCILL-B FREE SOFTWARE LICENSE AGREEMENT > Programming Lang: bmake > Description : bmake macros for building OCaml projects, TeX > projects, and more Michaël, does it have to be under CeCILL-B license? I have asked few people I know who are quite well-educated regarding software licensing, and they were uncertain about the status of this license. I also see you used to distribute this piece of software under 3-clause BSD license. What's wrong with it, why have you decided to switch? By the way, it would be cool if you could integrate your makefiles to mk-configure (or make them compatible with it), so mk-configure users can benefit from them. -- Cheers, Andrew
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
