On 28/07/14 at 16:03 +0200, Axel Beckert wrote: > Control: retitle 675187 ITP: curses-apt-key -- Text-mode key manager for > apt-key > Control: owner 675187 ! > > Dear Lucas, > > Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > retitle 675187 RFP: curses-apt-key -- Text-mode key manager for apt-key > > noowner 675187 > > tag 675187 - pending > > *grrr* > > > A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging curses-apt-key. > > Unfortunately, > > it seems that it did not happen. > > Of course. Did you see the "Fix blocked by 675199"? > > Please modify your script so that it doesn't touch WNPP bug reports > with a "Fix blocked by". TIA. > > > In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as > > it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from > > packaging the software. > > I still disagree on this.
It's probably not your case, but I've seen too many ITPs or ITAs be used as a protective measure to prevent others from working on a package to disagree with your disagreement. Does an annual ping really hurt that much? Lucas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140728144653.gb3...@xanadu.blop.info
