Just a quick note to inform that I just removed the sd-daemon.[ch] files and I depend on system provided ones (at libsystemd-daemon-dev).
Also fixed jquery, I added the uncompressed one. Currently its not in control / depends, as I want to make my head if it should be enforced or not, but as systemd is on Debian's future, I guess it fits. Regads, 2014-04-24 18:44 GMT+02:00 David Moreno Montero <dmor...@coralbits.com>: > You are right about sd-daemon.[ch] file, I forgot about it. I think I can > remove it as its included in libsystemd-daemon-dev. I add the bug to the > onion issue tracker to do it asap. > > The proper license for src (except that files) is both GPLv2 and Apache2. > I just changed the README.rst. > > > 2014-04-24 18:19 GMT+02:00 László Böszörményi (GCS) <g...@debian.org>: > > On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 5:40 PM, David Moreno Montero >> <dmor...@coralbits.com> wrote: >> > If you agree, you may branch the onion source at github, and pull >> request me the changes. >> OK, will do. >> >> > About jquery, is it ok to include it non-minified? Also could be used >> straight from the jquery CDN, but somehow I feel users would feel more >> secure if its using only local resources. >> Better if not. 1) Not all users will have internet access for CDN. 2) >> jQuery may have performance / security issues anytime. Just depend on >> the needed version, as it's already packaged and taken care of. >> >> > About library versioning, I just added it, but I got a bug report that >> its not following proper libtool standards. I'm still fixing that, but the >> current solution should be on the debian branch. >> OK, waiting for that. >> >> > About manpages, I can try to prepare them ASAP, but some tips are >> welcome about how to create great manpages: which programs/commands? is >> groff the recomended way? >> For a start you may use 'apt-get install help2man; man help2man'. >> >> One more problem btw. LICENSE.txt states: "Contents of the src folder >> (the Library) is licensed under both GPLv2+ and Apache 2." while >> README.rst states: "The library is under the LGPL license, [...]" >> (which one?), then see a file, for example src/onion/block.c which has >> only Apache 2.0 license header. Which one is correct? Then you link >> together everything with src/onion/sd-daemon.[ch] which is licensed >> under MIT. I'm not a license expert and don't know what the result >> will be. Does linking MIT with (L)GPL code allowed? Where's / how MIT >> license vanished from the resulting library? >> >> Laszlo/GCS >> > > > > -- > David Moreno Montero > > dmor...@coralbits.com > +34 658 18 77 17 > +44 74 23 21 01 57 > <http://www.coralbits.com/> > http://www.coralbits.com > > > -- David Moreno Montero dmor...@coralbits.com +34 658 18 77 17 +44 74 23 21 01 57 <http://www.coralbits.com/> http://www.coralbits.com
