On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 6:58 PM, Faidon Liambotis <parav...@debian.org> wrote: > On 01/04/14 19:54, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: >> Anyway, folly is packaged and uploaded. HHVM is one small step >> closer to be part of Debian. > > Does folly have a stable ABI? I remember raising this with Paul some time > ago and us deciding that embedding folly into the HHVM source would be the > way to go, as there is really no stable interface between them. I can't answer this question. Still, I expect that HHVM will follow ABI changes very fast. Paul? Anyway, I think having a separate package and let users get knowledge of that doesn't mean HHVM can't use an embedded copy if it needs to. But it should be a separate package whenever it's possible.
> Also, you're really supposed to file separate ITPs for separate packages > (and file them *before* you make an upload). ??? Please see its ITP[1]. I just noted the upload here. It's closed by the changelog in the folly package if that will be accepted into the archive. Laszlo/GCS [1] http://bugs.debian.org/734188 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cakjshr3aojb_enkvefzcknswqn4mu58t+3vf97bzyw-nx_e...@mail.gmail.com
