On 01/12/2013 13:00, Gilles Filippini wrote: > Hi, > > Gilles Filippini a écrit , Le 25/11/2013 18:40: >> Sylvestre Ledru a écrit , Le 25/11/2013 18:17: >>> If someone wants to step in to help on HDF5, he/she is more than welcome. >>> >>> I am planning to maintain it but help is welcome. >>> For example, some tasks which should be done: >>> * fix the git repository (git import-orig ../hdf5_1.8.12.orig.tar.gz fails >>> with conflicts) >>> * package the new upstream release (1.8.12) /!\ in the release 11, the >>> SONAME was wrongly changed >>> to 8 for no real reason. We should check if the 8 is deserved or not. >>> * backport the arm64 ubuntu changes >> I step in. I'll start with the git stuff. > I've successfully imported and merged the new upstream release. There > were no conflicts at all. I've also refreshed the patch set and achieved > a first successful build. At this stage I'd like to push my changes to > alioth. I applied yesterday for pkg-grass membership for this purpose. Thanks! > I'm now in the process of updating the symbol files, and I'm a bit > puzzled by the many '#MISSING: 1.8.x# flags present in > libhdf5-mpich2-7.symbols and libhdf5-openmpi-7.symbols. Shouldn't > removed symbols bump the SONAME? Yep, probably. Could you share the list of the missing items ? > There are also a lot of '(optional)' and '(arch xxx)' tags. What are the > rationals for setting them? > The symbol list differs from an arch to the other ... :/
Sylvestre -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/529b264d.6020...@debian.org
