On 03.11.2013 01:30, Jérémy Lal wrote: > On 03/11/2013 00:56, Jean-Christophe Dubacq wrote: .... >> 3. Seriously, one package for _18_ lines of code? >
To the very least the package should be renamed e.g. node-bytereprconverter or something less generic. bytes is far too generic, not really related to what it actually does, and pollutes the (node) namespace. Given that there is no agreement on what is the right way to do what this package attempts to do, I think packaging should stalled until upstream actually provides useful functionality, like being able to choose between both interpretations of representations. Reverse depends requiring the package in its current form can easily be patched with these few lines. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52765eeb.9090...@googlemail.com