Seem like I totally forgot about this package! Any progress here? Any way I can help?
A. On 2012-09-28 10:57:12, Antoine Beaupré wrote: > On 2012-09-28, Stefan Fiel wrote: >> Hi, >> >> yes, you were right i was dealing with the hardening-no-relro warning >> if you just check out the svn (0.4.0 or trunk), debuild -us -uc then i >> get no warning or error from lentian (also when building this dsc with >> pbuilder). Don't know if this is a good way of checking packages. > > It's a great way! > > I still believe the fixes I suggested need to be applied if they haven't > been yet. > >> currently i don't use svn-buildpackage, wasn't aware of its existence >> when starting to make the first package for ubuntu :) Since we are >> planing to move to git in the next weeks/month I have not tried it with >> this. > > That's great! In this case I encourage you to take a look at > git-buildpackage. :) > > A. > > PS: regarding native vs non-native package, what I often do is that I > maintain a different repository for the debian meta-data. For example, > even though I am a maintainer in the Drush project, I chose to split out > the debian directory in a separate git repository because: > > a) it allows non-drush people to maintain the package > b) it makes it possible to maintain different *branches* for the > package (say stable and dev) and merge packaging changes between them > *without* merging stable in the upstream source code > c) it makes it easier for Ubuntu or other non-Debian people to make > changes to the package > > See the drush package here: > > http://git.debian.org/git/collab-maint/drush.git > > It also uses git-buildpackage. > > -- > Si Dieu existe, j'espère qu'Il a une excuse valable > - Daniel Pennac -- There has been only one Christian. They caught him and crucified him -- early. - Mark Twain
pgpUUnw3XXXWJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
