Dominic Hargreaves wrote... > I'm now looking at the packaging of Anope 1.8.8 so in the absence > of further responses from Christopher am taking ownership of this > bug. Of course, if Christopher would like to get involved again I'd > be very happy to collaborate.
Ups. Seems I either oversaw your previous message or I forgot about it. Since, however, I did not continue my work on Anope anyway, that package is probably better in your hands. One request ... please do the ngircd users a favour and package 1.9.x since 1.8.x does not have support for ngircd yet. From my remembrance, Debianisation of Anope wasn't easy, mostly since it appearently wasn't written with Debian's requirements in mind (just saying, no one to blame here). I can provide you my incomplete Debianisation of 1.9.6, but with a no questions asked policy only :) It's just I forgot most of the gory details. The major things and as far as I can recall: * Anope's file system layout is not at all FHS-like, you have to patch that. Expect some surprises. * The module loader uses randomized file names. Completely unnecessary, drop that. * There is an openssl linkage without an according exception by upstream. Try to get one (I failed), or ship Anope without. Cheers, Christoph
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature