On Fri, 28 Jun 2013 09:44:12 +0200, Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org> wrote:
>> But then again, not much as happened on development side in the >> last few years. > > IMHO miredo works fine for years now and I don't miss anything. So > from my point of viewthere's no need for new features. :-) > > If "not much happened" is just bug fixing where necessary, that should > be fine if it continues that way. Hmm well, the whole link-local multicast thing in the development branch that has never really been tested (that I'd know of) or released. Also there are quite a few extensions from the Microsoft/IETF Teredo protocol update that have not been implemented. And then, integration with the network manager and init could be better. I can carry on upstream maintenance, but I don't think I ever will implement the fancy missing bits. > (And the optimist inside me thinks that at some point in time, we > won't need miredo anymore since IPv6 will be everywhere. ;-) > > Tomasz Buchert wrote: >> well I definitely can't promise I will take over >> upstream development. > > For me it's even a "I know that I can't". > >> I will look at the Debian package, fix stuff, and then we'll see. > > That's also my usual approach. :-) There should be a few fixes in my miredo-debian.git that never hit Debian. If you don't take them, we should probably clear the pending tag on the corresponding bugs. -- Rémi Denis-Courmont Sent from my collocated server -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/62facced4997f679492434715db87...@chewa.net
