Am Donnerstag, den 20.06.2013, 10:06 +0200 schrieb Guillaume Duhamel: > > It would be great if you find the time to answer! > > Sorry for not replying to previous mails :)
No problem, thanks a lot for answering this one! > > I don't mind much the licensing terms for my work on Twig package, > so if Paul wants MIT, it's ok for me. Great, so we all agree using MIT for the packaging. > > It's been some time I worked on this package, but at the time I created > another repository: https://github.com/Guillaumito/twig-gbp using > debian git-buildpackage. Is it useful? > Thanks for sharing this information. It might would have been useful, but I think the new packaging [1] based on Paul's repository is already pretty final. The main thing currently holding twig back is an issue [2] with the licensing of twig's documentation. I hope upstream will answer my question on github soon, since I don't like the idea of dropping twic-doc out. [1] https://github.com/ymc/twig-debian/tree/feature/reprocess-initial-debian-packaging [2] https://github.com/fabpot/Twig/issues/1118 > Guillaume -- Daniel Swiss
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
