2012/11/30 Andreas Tille <andr...@an3as.eu>:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 05:00:14PM +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
[...]
>> Is it really not part of GNU? I see the URL being a subdomain of gnu.org:
>>
>> >> [...]
>> >> * URL : http://health.gnu.org/
>> >> [...]
>>
>> And from their webpage:
>> | Health is an official GNU package, part of the GNU System. All the
>> | development is at : GNU Health project[1] at Savannah
Yes, GNU health is an official GNU package.
> I think either
>
> gnu-health or gnuhealth
>
> would be a proper package name because it is just the name of the
> project. We also do have gnumed-{server,client} packages because the
> project ist named GNUmed. We just have to settle with a reasonable
> name without space (and '_') and need to stick to lower case letters.
gnuhealth is the one I prefer, closest to the official project name,
and unlikely to get in conflict with other future packages (using
"health" alone would be too generic)
> BTW, the packaging in
>
> svn://svn.debian.org/debian-med/trunk/packages/gnuhealth/trunk/
>
> has "gnuhealth" as package name.
>
> Kind regards
>
> Andreas.
>
> PS: Most probably it makes sense to let reportbug reject invalid package
> names in ITP bugs.
>
> --
> http://fam-tille.de
+Emilien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/canqxmqglrfyzwsxg_un-bpmxlswym-3mewuqfqeepphbtqb...@mail.gmail.com
