On Sat, 10 Nov 2012 13:55:41 +0100 Maxime Hadjinlian <maxime.hadjinl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > Owner: Maxime Hadjinlian <maxime.hadjinl...@gmail.com> > > * Package name : plum > Version : 0.1 > Upstream Author : Maxime Hadjinlian <maxime.hadjinl...@gmail.com> > * URL : http://github.com/maximeh/plum > * License : BSD > Programming Lang: C++, Python, Shell Scripts > Description : plum is a command line tool used to interact with the > U-Boot netconsole of any LaCie product Couldn't the package use a name which is more clearly identified as related to either lacie or uboot? The more specific the package name the better, unless the package is going to gain support for the uboot netconsole on many more products. The package name is far from being as specific as the package itself. General purpose names are (relatively) fine for general purpose programs. The Description isn't suitable for a real package, it should at the very least refer to uboot and lacie. Whichever keyword doesn't get added to the package name needs to be in the short description. -- Neil Williams ============= http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgpTpcyZLT9cp.pgp
Description: PGP signature
