Just bouncing this one to serve as a reference, since I forgot to do it in the first place when replying. Further discissions will take plane in the pkg- list.
On Wednesday 01 August 2012 21:28:22 bash.d wrote: > Hello, George Danchev, > > I would like to help you maintaining the libisofs-package. > I already replied to the BTS entry, but have not yet received any > response. If you are interested, please answer me. > Thank you and regards, Hi Sebastian, [I added pkg-libburnia-devel@ in CC, where Thomas Schmitt is also subscribed] Thank you for your offer to help, it is really appreciated. It is of course my fault of not paying attention close to RFH#679254, but you did it right pinging my on private. Thanks! The three libraries of libburn (RFH#679249), libisofs, and libisoburn (RFH#679265) are best to be maintained together, and involve quite some interaction with upstream, which is fortunately very responsive and helpful. See http://libburnia-project.org for details, and the upstream list is libburn-hack...@pykix.org. For libisofs in particular, there is an effort to complete the hybrid fs part, which involves HFS+ (see libisofs/hfsplus*.c|h in bzr) and HFS (no plus) - no code yet. ISO9660/HFS hybrid is used for the production of Debian PowerPC images, and in order to replace the old and almost unmaintained genisoimage, it would be nice to have this one properly implemented, verified and deployed. (actually these are HFS#630351 and UDF#630863, the latter being a goal in the distant future). The libburnia libraries are covered by in-house test suite called 'releng': See, README, TODO and CHECKLIST, as well as the code at: http://libburnia-project.org/browser/libisoburn/trunk/releng Extending and running this test suite is a good way to build trust that no or less regressions would occur. Then comes the debian-cd task, which is the largest "stress-test suite" for xorriso (and resp. libisofs in particular) currently known to us, so it is also nice to pay attention to debian-cd BTS record for relevant bugs, the debian-cd mailing list for relevant complaints, and debian-cd live logs as well: http://cdbuilder.debian.org/cdimage-log/ (also see analysis.html) Last, but not least, it is also nice to try to help applications which are trying to make proper use (or resp. abuse) of libburnia libraries to find their way. For instance, see brasero BTS record. To summarize: there is a plenty of code work, thrice as much testing and bug triaging and sorting out (coupled and decoupled) issues or non-issues... and I'm pretty sure Thomas can add some more points as well. While it is true that libburn/libisofs/libisoburn currently bear almost perfectly clean BTS log record, it took, takes, and will take a fair amount of time to preserve this state as it is. So, feel free to pick your niche to contribute to the project :) -- pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB <people.fccf.net/danchev/key pgp.mit.edu> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201208021228.58317.danc...@spnet.net