On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 09:53:00PM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote: > Yes, this would send the XF86ScreenSaver which would kick the > screensaver of the currently displayed X session. This is another > (imperfect) way to solve the problem of locking the user's screen > without needing either an entry in /var/run/utmp or consolekit.
But this is not the problem. If it was just the screensaver a hard dependency wouldn't be needed. After all screensaver itself is only recommended. The problem we were facing was that acpi-support has to figure out if other power management software was running before acting itself. And for that the X session information is needed. Michael -- Michael Meskes Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org) Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org Jabber: michael.meskes at googlemail dot com VfL Borussia! Força Barça! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120709080603.ga11...@feivel.credativ.lan
