On Sun, 2012-06-24 at 20:44 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Sun, 24 Jun 2012, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Sun, 2012-06-24 at 13:05 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > > [...] > > > > > 3. firmware-nonfree _really_ needs a README.source :-) > > > > > > > > Yeah. > > [...] > > > > Fixed in svn; let me know if it's missing anything. > > Ah, it helps a lot, thanks. Reading it, I think I know where I went wrong. > > A few questions: x86 microcode really is useful only for arch i386 and > amd64. Should I leave it as arch all? I am not sure firmware-nonfree is > prepared to have arch-specific packages, but...
Since there is currently no way to say that a package can be installed
on these two architectures, I would say arch:all.
> I may also need to add a Depends: to the control file template, but it looks
> straightforward to do that.
Right, just follow the pattern for the other package relations.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Lowery's Law:
If it jams, force it. If it breaks, it needed replacing anyway.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
