On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 11:57:54PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 11:50:19PM +0200, Mike Gabriel wrote: > ... > > you may want to have a very little bit more history... (and a > > packaging folder) > > http://code.x2go.org/gitweb?p=libjpeg-turbo.git;a=summary > > This is one of them. Ubuntu package history is another one. > > > We would have to import latest upstream on top of that > > Well, unless we all agree to reset git repo, this is impossible to do. I > like to do it.... > > > but the packaging works fine for libjpeg8 emulation mode. > > Sure, what I commited is something like this plus new upstream. > It should work fine for libjpeg8 emulation mode. > > > However, I really think that we should put the dpkg-divert stuff > > into an extra bin:package (in the same libjpeg-turbo src:package, of > > course).
It is not reasonnable for libjpeg-turbo to dpkg-divert libjpeg8, since it does not provide the same features set and break libjpeg-progs at least. (there is a lot of features that are missing in libjpeg-turbo and some file created by libjpeg8 cannot be rendered correctly by libjpeg-turbo). Instead the set of application that need libjpeg-turbo could use LD_LIBRARY_PATH etc. (put libjpeg-turbo in /usr/lib/libjpeg-turbo/libjpeg8 and do LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/libjpeg-turbo/libjpeg8:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH in a wrapper script) Cheers, -- Bill. <ballo...@debian.org> Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120601151917.GA13153@yellowpig
